Coal, Oil, and GasPetrographic Characterization of Fly Ash |
|
||||||
IntroductionFly ash is a volumetrically dominant type of coal combustion product; we must understand its properties in order to better utilize it. Petrographic composition is one of these properties. Petrographic analysis provides information about the contribution and type of carbon as well as relating to other parameters, such as surface area, and the analysis is also relatively inexpensive. In recent years, two distinct systems for describing ash petrography have been used. The system devised by Bailey (Bailey and others, 1990), and modified by Lester (Lester and others, 1997) and Alvarez (Alvarez and others, 1997), emphasizes textural description of the char structure. This system is the base of char classification considered by the International Committee of Coal Petrology. The system used at the Center for Applied Energy Research, UK (Hower and others, 1995 and later), places more of an emphasis on the forms of carbon and inorganic matter in fly ash. New classification by Hower and Mastalerz (2001) combines the two classifications, including carbon forms, inorganic constituents, and the textural features of chars. |
|||||||
Texture-based classification (modified from Bailey and others, 1990, Lester and others, 1997, and Alvarez and others, 1997)1. Gives a textural description of char particles that may be related
to the origin (T-boiler temperature, coal rank, etc.); |
|||||||
|
Click the image below to open a PDF file with a larger view (56k, requires Adobe® Reader®).
|
|||||||
Reflected light, horizontal axis 240 µm.
|
|||||||
Carbon type-based classification (based on Hower and others, 1995).1. Gives information on carbon types that is related to the surface properties
of the fly ash; |
|||||||
Reflected light, horizontal axis 240 µm.
|
|||||||
Combined classification by Hower and Mastalerz1. In order to gain more information from petrographic analysis, we propose
combining the two classifications (Hower and Mastalerz, 2001, Energy &
Fuels, no.15, p. 1319-1321) |
|||||||
|
Combined classification by Hower and Mastalerz Click the image below to open a PDF file with a larger view (19k, requires
Adobe® Reader®).
Values are given to show how the contribution of individual categories are calculated. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
Reflected light, horizontal axis 240 µm. |
|||||||
Conclusions1. Fly ash is a complex material and understanding its properties is important in its utilization. 2. Fly ash has a low carbon content for commercial purposes. Therefore, a classification is necessary that accounts for both the carbon and inorganic fraction of the fly ash. 3. The classification also must describe associations of components within individual particles in order to better predict the behavior of the fly ash. 4. The combined classification we are proposing attempts to address some of these aspects, although further modification may be needed depending upon individual purposes. |
|||||||
AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Indiana and Kentucky power plants for allowing us to collect samples. |
|||||||
Geology | GIS/Maps | About Us | Bookstore | Interactive Maps | Licensing
IGSInfo@indiana.edu / 812-855-7636
Accessibility Information
Copyright, Map Disclaimer, and Limitation of Warranties and Liability